So, why push for climate change initiatives if you profess not to believe in climate change?
It’s a question that might be asked of News Corp. founder Rupert Murdoch this week after the parent company of Fox, the Daily, and the Wall Street Journal announced that it is now carbon neutral.
The carbon-neutral goal, first announced in 2007, was achieved through a combination of carbon offsets (controversial in and of themselves) and creative internal initiatives, according to Greenbiz. The company’s Dow Jones campus in New Jersey, for example, set up a solar system that will provide up to half of its energy when completed—and it will be the largest solar system at a commercial site in the country. A joint program between Fox Home Entertainment and Walmart also slashed material and transportation emissions by making DVD packaging lighter.
News Corp. now has a series of goals for 2015 to work towards, including cutting absolute greenhouse gas emissions by 15% compared to 2006 levels, improving the environmental impacts of its 100 largest suppliers, and measuring and reducing its waste footprint.
All of this from the company that owns Fox News, whose Washington editor commanded during the Copenhagen climate summit in 2009 that the network shouldn’t mention climate change ”without immediately pointing out that such theories are based upon data that critics have called into question.”
So what’s the deal? News Corp. claims that the business side of things is completely separate from the creative and editorial side of the organization. Apparently, News Corp.’s real beliefs about climate change can be deduced more from its actions than from the words of its writers and news anchors.
God, if you’re going to ignore reality, you should at least have the moral fiber to commit to it.
the problem i have with this photo is yes it’s true but they put fluoride in the tap water & L.A. has some of the worst water
(Source: fastcompany)
So, why push for climate change initiatives if you profess not to believe in climate change?
It’s a question that might be asked of News Corp. founder Rupert Murdoch this week after the parent company of Fox, the Daily, and the Wall Street Journal announced that it is now carbon neutral.
The carbon-neutral goal, first announced in 2007, was achieved through a combination of carbon offsets (controversial in and of themselves) and creative internal initiatives, according to Greenbiz. The company’s Dow Jones campus in New Jersey, for example, set up a solar system that will provide up to half of its energy when completed—and it will be the largest solar system at a commercial site in the country. A joint program between Fox Home Entertainment and Walmart also slashed material and transportation emissions by making DVD packaging lighter.
News Corp. now has a series of goals for 2015 to work towards, including cutting absolute greenhouse gas emissions by 15% compared to 2006 levels, improving the environmental impacts of its 100 largest suppliers, and measuring and reducing its waste footprint.
All of this from the company that owns Fox News, whose Washington editor commanded during the Copenhagen climate summit in 2009 that the network shouldn’t mention climate change ”without immediately pointing out that such theories are based upon data that critics have called into question.”
So what’s the deal? News Corp. claims that the business side of things is completely separate from the creative and editorial side of the organization. Apparently, News Corp.’s real beliefs about climate change can be deduced more from its actions than from the words of its writers and news anchors.
God, if you’re going to ignore reality, you should at least have the moral fiber to commit to it.
the problem i have with this photo is yes it’s true but they put fluoride in the tap water & L.A. has some of the worst water
(Source: fastcompany)
reblogged from purehemp
originally posted by fastcompany
-
riseabovethemadness likes this
-
silverspanner reblogged this from fastcompany
-
onlyallmyreblogs reblogged this from fastcompany
-
bitchalicious reblogged this from fastcompany
-
bonedust likes this
-
jorgecazares likes this
-
migeo likes this
-
geeklikeme reblogged this from climateadaptation and added:
Do they purchase enough carbon offsets to cover the millions of people they delude into thinking climate change isn’t...
-
funkadelicsoul reblogged this from purehemp and added:
the problem i have with this photo is yes it’s true but they put fluoride in the tap water & L.A. has some of the worst...
-
abcsoupdot likes this
-
ramblin-minds reblogged this from purehemp
-
flippant-rejoinder likes this
-
climateadaptation likes this
-
climateadaptation reblogged this from fastcompany and added:
News Corp., owner of Fox and WSJ, is carbon neutral. WHY??
-
checkedpanther reblogged this from purehemp
-
diverting likes this
-
enigmaticdrama likes this
-
purehemp reblogged this from fastcompany
-
vivacious likes this
-
dylannord likes this
-
cameleonparisienne likes this
-
theparadigm likes this
-
designgood likes this
-
minicosm reblogged this from fastcompany
-
canisfamiliaris reblogged this from fastcompany and added:
Climate Change-Denying News Corp. Crows About Its Carbon Neutrality So, why push climate change initiatives if you...
-
angelawublog reblogged this from fastcompany
-
nadiathinks likes this
-
jimmjimms likes this
-
fastcompany posted this
